Home

Services

Revenue Cycle ManagementPractice GrowthPatient ExperiencePlatform & IntegrationsSpecialized Builds

Who We Serve

DSOs & Multi-Location GroupsDental Software ProvidersDental-Tech FoundersPractice & Coaching FirmsGPOs (Group Purchasing)Dental Labs & Adjacent

Resources

Blog Case studies

Company

About Webstrail Trust Center FAQ Contact Us

How we approached it

AI that drafts, clinicians who decide

The constraint was established before any modelling began: the system would propose and a dentist would dispose. That is a clinical-safety and regulatory position rather than a design preference, and it shaped the architecture — every draft required explicit sign-off, every proposal had to be explainable, and nothing reached a patient unreviewed.

The imaging work focused on surfacing candidates rather than declaring findings. Regions of interest were highlighted on the radiograph itself with location and confidence, so a clinician could evaluate the suggestion in a glance instead of trusting a score. We tuned thresholds with clinical input, accepting more false positives than a pure accuracy metric would favour, because a missed lesion carries a very different cost from an unnecessary second look — and a system that cries wolf gets switched off within a fortnight.

Treatment plan drafting sat on top. Proposals were sequenced sensibly, with urgent work first and dependencies respected, and costed using the practice's own fee schedule. Crucially, drafts incorporated live benefit data — remaining annual maximum, frequency limitations, coverage by category — so the figure presented to a patient resembled what they would actually owe. Nothing erodes case acceptance faster than an estimate that changes later.

Integration into the existing clinical workflow mattered as much as the modelling. Findings and drafts appeared in the tools clinicians already used; a separate portal with its own login would not have survived contact with a busy surgery.

Acceptance and edit patterns fed back into the model, so it improved against these clinicians' actual practice rather than a generic average — and every draft, edit and approval was logged, which matters both clinically and for the audit trail.

Case studies  /  AI treatment-plan & imaging assistant

AI module · Clinical AI

AI that drafts treatment plans and reads imaging

AI treatment-plan assistance and image processing built inside a dental product — turning clinical data into a faster, more consistent workflow.

AI module Clinical AI Clinician-in-the-loop Imaging
Client
Dental software product team
Type
AI module
Focus
Clinical AI & imaging
What we did
AI plan drafting, image processing, product integration

The client

A team building a dental software product who wanted to add AI directly into the clinical workflow their users already lived in — not as a separate tool clinicians had to leave the chart to use.

The challenge

Treatment planning and imaging review are where a lot of clinical time goes, and where inconsistency creeps in between providers. The team wanted AI to take the first pass — but in a way clinicians could trust, correct, and own.

  • Drafting plans by hand took time, and the structure varied from provider to provider.
  • Imaging review meant pulling up images separately and reading them without any structured assist.
  • Any AI had to be clinician-in-the-loop — a draft to review and edit, never an unsupervised decision.
  • It had to live inside the existing dental product, fitting the data and the workflow already in place.

What we built

An AI module embedded in the product, designed so the clinician stays in control at every step:

  • AI-drafted treatment plans generated from the patient's clinical data, presented as an editable starting point the clinician reviews and finalizes.
  • Dental image processing that surfaces findings to support the clinician's read, rather than replacing it.
  • A clinician-in-the-loop design throughout — every AI output is framed as a suggestion, with clear review and override before anything is committed.
  • Native integration into the dental product, so the assist appears where the work already happens and writes into the existing flow.

We started in Figma, mapped the real clinical workflow first, and built the AI to fit how clinicians actually think and work — with their feedback shaping each iteration.

The results

  • Treatment-plan drafting became a review-and-refine step rather than a blank-page task, helping plans come together more consistently.
  • Imaging review gained a structured first pass the clinician could lean on or set aside.
  • Clinicians kept full authority over every plan and read — the AI assisted, it never decided.
  • The capability landed inside the product users already trusted, with no separate tool to learn.

Why it worked

The module earned trust because it respected the clinician. AI did the tedious first pass, the clinician made the call, and everything happened inside the workflow they already knew. Built as an ongoing partnership — designed around the clinical reality, not bolted on after the fact.

Want AI inside your clinical workflow?

Tell us what you're building or fixing. The first call is free, and you'll get an honest read on whether and how we can help.

Contact Us